The school financing of the new method while many education monitors focus on masks, vaccines and government infection levels. The Los Angeles unified school district is trying to implement a completely new financial model for schools. With its own accounts, and has been thinking about student-centered funding for two decades. The idea is simple. Instead of funding buildings and programs. The district cuts its money into student-sized chunks which are then followed by every student in whatever school they choose to attend.

If this model sounds familiar, it is because the idea of Money following the student is a central doctrine of market-based school choice. The SCF (also known as a budgeting-based student) does not allow money to attend out-of-district students in private schools, but as noted by the SCF/SBB fan reason foundation, Lays the foundation for better school choice. LAUSD is not the first SCF district to operate. Chicago implemented SBB after strong objections from the teachers’ union.

• The SCF is often sold as an equity engine, but a report released in 2019 showed that according to SBB.
• Chicago schools with the most resources were concentrated in slums and black neighborhoods.
• It is difficult to see how SCF can operate in an unfunded area.
• If the cake isn’t big enough to feed everyone, no amount of creative cutting can change it. And as schools lose enrollment, they lose funding.
• For schools with unchanged heating and transportation costs.
• The funding per student is shrinking. According to the SCF, the building administrator receives a lot of money, which he must then use Effectively, but in Chicago.
• Where the SCF faced test-based accountability. The positions that did not affect the scores of the tests have been reduced.

The School Financing of New Method for the Preparing Is LAUSD:

LAUSD proposes a formula according to which schools receive Supplements for students in specific categories (financially disadvantaged, English-speaking students, low test scores), but the Extra amounts are small and do not recognize a variety of needs different in these groups. The LAUSD presentation highlights some schools that would benefit from the project, but the SCF is a zero-sum game. For every Winning school, there must be a loser. In such a plan, there is no targeted initiative for special programs in high schools. Under the SCF, a school gets its share based on the formula and, if they feel they need more money.

• They can only get it by chasing students from other schools, who then lose money (there is a Harmless operation that gradually you will be deleted).
• The SCF creates an unexpected bolt for schools that need to compete rather than collaborate. Imagine a school, devising a successful, groundbreaking program and immediately shutting.
• It is down to make sure no other school can steal a valuable marketing tool.
• The year 2022-2023 is scheduled to be the first for the SCF at LAUSD. And the area promises Implications such as Accelerating learning for all students.
• And Better outcomes for students. Parents in the area will have to wait a few more years to see if the promise is kept.